http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20091009/us_time/08599192939500

This article linked above agrees with me that Nobel Peace Prize is not what Obama needs right now.  What comes to my mind is less talk more action and I'm sure he has done actions but it's still too early to tell wether his actions truly will be beneficial and if it truly is for peace or merely to get reelected.  Giving someone peace prize simply because he shows up on TV a whole lot making speeches about peace does not seem valid in my opinion.  Let's focus on the issues he said.  Then's focus on the issue and leave the prize until he has proven himself not just end result but his intention and his dedication for peace.  If someone wins a Nobel Peace prize I expected it to go to someone who worked on bringing harmony and peace to domestic and international.  His focus has been financial and growth of our economy.  I want economy to grow but if that's what he's been accomplishing how does that relate to peace?  More money means more peace?  Then how come rich people still commit suicides?  Well that's a bit going off but you get my point.